During the 2021 growing season, Dr. Eric Hunt of Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. will be providing weekly updates of the soil moisture index (SMI) from the Noah-MP version 3.6 land surface model in the NASA LIS framework for the entire U.S. and regional analysis of the SMI over the four regions of U.S. where the majority of corn, soybean, wheat, and cotton production occurs. Additionally, soil moisture index maps of South American and western Russia are provided at the end of the blog. The analysis is intended to provide the larger agricultural and meteorological communities insight as to areas where soil moisture is excessive or deficient compared to average for that location and what that may mean for impacts. It is my goal that these maps can be an early warning signal for flash drought development or where flash flooding could be likely in the coming week if heavy precipitation materializes. Please be advised that the SMI should be viewed as complementary, not a substitute, to the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) and that declarations of drought or flash flood potential for a particular location should never be based on the SMI alone. The Evaporative Stress Index (ESI) and VegDRI will included in our analysis a bit later this season. Various other maps that help give insight into current conditions across the U.S will also be shown as needed
This blog post was partially supported by NASA grant 80NSSC19K1266.
Order of Maps and Tables in today’s Ag Blog
- Figure 1. CONUS Soil Moisture Index map
- Figure 2. Driest Grid Points
- Figure 3. 30-day Volumetric Water Content change
- Figure 4. U.S. Drought Monitor
- Figure 5. Quick Drought Response Index map
- Figure 6a. Great Plains GrassCast
- Figure 6b. Southwest GrassCast
- Figure 7. South America Soil Moisture Index map
- Figure 8. Western Russia/Ukraine Soil Moisture Index map
As of last Thursday (22 April), 75% of the grid points in the NLDAS-2 domain (Fig. 1) have a soil moisture index (SMI) at or less than 0.0. In other words, roughly three-quarters of the country has drier than average soils. Thankfully the percentage of grid points with an SMI less than -3.0 (Fig. 2) is under 30 percent. Still the amount of area with lower soil moisture as we inch closer to summer is concerning and more of the country has less root zone soil moisture in an absolute sense (Fig. 3) than a month ago.
The SMI maps are in reasonable agreement with the U.S. Drought Monitor (Fig. 4) and the Quick Drought Response Index (Fig. 5), which was designed to be responsive to more rapidly intensifying drought. In addition to a majority of the western U.S., which seems to be mimicking a line from an old Johnny Cash song about “perpetual drought”, other areas of current concern are the Great Lakes/Ohio River Valley region, North Dakota (excluding the southeast corner) and the coastal southeast. The biggest concern of the three is North Dakota, mostly because the drought has been ongoing for months and little rain is forecast. The area of concern in Georgia into the Carolinas is not in drought yet but given the current conditions and forecasted precipitation, it may be headed in that direction. Precipitation in the Great Lakes region looks more promising over the next ten days, though there should be enough dry weather to get some planting in.
My sources from rural areas in eastern Nebraska and western Illinois indicate some farmers are making progress planting soybean and there should be enough dry windows in most of the Corn Belt to make decent planting progress overall in the coming 7-10 days. Spring wheat planting is ahead of schedule in the northern U.S. but it will be imperative for rain to return to North Dakota in the coming weeks or yields likely will be lower than in 2017. This week also features two GrassCast maps (Fig. 6a-b). GrassCast shows the expected deviation from average of pasture biomass in the Great Plains and Southwest regions. Assuming average precipitation, GrassCast is currently forecasting fair conditions in the Plains. However, even with average or above average precipitation, there is a strong likelihood of much below average forage production in the coming season.
Better news this week across South America and Russia, where many dry areas have picked up some beneficial moisture.
Figure 1. The Soil Moisture Index (SMI) for the 7-day period ending 22 April 2021. Results are based on output from the 0-1 m (surface to 3.23 feet) layers in the Noah-Multiparameterization (Noah-MP) land surface model. Noah-MP is run in the NASA Land Information System (LIS) framework with the North American Land Data Assimilation Version 2 (NLDAS-2) forcing dataset. The SMI calculation is based on the soil moisture index created in Hunt et al. (2009) such that ‘5’(dark blue) is the wettest and ‘-5’ (dark red) the driest for the period of record. The period of record used calculate the SMI for the current map is 1979-present.
Figure 2. Lowest 20th (10th) percentile of soil moisture as depicted by red (dark red) pixels for the week ending 22 April 2021.
Figure 3. The 30-day change in volumetric water content of the root zone between 23 March and 22 April 2021.
Figure 4. U.S. Drought Monitor map as of 20 April 2021. Map courtesy of the National Drought Mitigation Center.
Figure 5. Most recent Quick Drought Response Index (QuickDRI) map courtesy of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Additional information can be found here.
Figure 6a. GrassCast forecast for the Great Plains region in 2021. Forecast assumes average precipitation. Map courtesy of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the USDA.
Figure 6b. GrassCast forecast for the Southwest region in 2021. Forecast assumes average precipitation. Map courtesy of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the USDA.
Figure 7. Soil moisture index (SMI) map) for the 7-day period ending 22 April 2021 over South America. Refer to the caption in Figure 1 for more details.
Figure 8. Soil moisture index (SMI) map) for the 7-day period ending 22 April 2021 over western Russia, Ukraine, and northwestern Kazakhstan. Refer to the caption in Figure 1 for more details. Black squares are missing data points.
About the author:
Eric Hunt is an agricultural climatologist from Lincoln, NE and has several members of his extended family actively farming in Illinois and Nebraska. Eric has been with AER since 2012 and received his Ph.D. from the University of Nebraska. Among other activities, he is currently working on NASA funded projects to study the evolution of flash drought. He routinely blogs about agriculture and weather on the AER website. He can be reached via email at email@example.com and @DroughtLIS on Twitter.
Founded in 1977, Atmospheric and Environmental Research is an award-winning environmental research, consulting and weather information services company with demonstrated expertise in numerical weather prediction, climate dynamics and radiation, circulation diagnostics, atmospheric chemistry, air quality and risk assessment, planetary sciences, remote sensing, satellite meteorology, and systems engineering. Consulting services are available. AER is a business unit of Verisk Analytics (VRSK). For more information, please visit our web site at www.aer.com.
Disclaimer: This report and the information and data contained herein (the Report) are wholly advisory in nature and are provided AS IS. AER makes no representations, covenants or warranties of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the Report, including, without limitation, warranties of condition, quality, durability, suitability, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, or in respect of any warranty arising by statute or otherwise in law or from a course of dealing or usage of trade. The information included in the Report may be statistical samples and/or actuarial calculations and AER makes no warranties or representations, either express or implied, that the Report will accurately reflect, predict or resemble experience for an entire industry or any member or members of any industry. AER shall have no liability and shall not be responsible for business and legal conclusions, judgments and decisions made with respect to the Report. AER does not warrant and makes no representations regarding the completeness, currency, accuracy or predictive value of the Report. AER makes no representations and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the Report and is not responsible for errors resulting from omitted, misstated or erroneous information or assumptions.