During the 2020 growing season, Dr. Eric Hunt of Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. will be providing weekly updates of the soil moisture index (SMI) from the Noah-MP land surface model in the NASA LIS framework for the entire U.S. and regional analysis of the SMI over the four regions of U.S. where the majority of corn, soybean, wheat, and cotton production occurs. The analysis is intended to provide the larger agricultural and meteorological communities insight as to areas where soil moisture is excessive or deficient compared to average for that location and what that may mean for impacts. It is my goal that these maps can be an early warning signal for flash drought development or where flash flooding could be likely in the coming week if heavy precipitation materializes. Please be advised that the SMI should be viewed as complementary, not a substitute, to the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) and that declarations of drought or flash flood potential for a particular location should never be based on the SMI alone. The Evaporative Stress Index (ESI) is also included in our analysis (when available) as are various other maps that help give insight into current conditions across the U.S.
This blog post was partially supported by NASA grant 80NSSC19K1266.
Order of Maps and Tables in today’s Ag Blog
- Figure 1. Soil Moisture Index Panel (U.S., southern Canada, northern Mexico)
- Table 1. Regional Soil Moisture
- Figure 2. SMI over the past four weeks
- Figure 3. SPoRT LIS map
- Figure 4. U.S. Drought Monitor
- Figure 5. Weekly precipitation
- Figure 6. Evaporative Stress Index
- Figure 7. Soil Moisture Index vs. Corn Trend
- Figure 8. Eastern Nebraska rainfed corn
The previous “Ag Blog week” that ended last Thursday morning saw significant drying across much of the Great Plains and western Corn Belt region for a second consecutive week (Figures 1 and 2). Last week I mentioned that the Great Plains South region would have around 50 percent of the grid points at or below -3.0. I was a bit bullish on the developing flash drought with that projection but the drying certainly continued in that region, with the percentage of grid points with an SMI below -3.0 increasing to ~ 47 percent, a 13 percent increase from the previous week and close to a 40 percent increase since the end of May. Further north in the Great Plains, the drying trend continued with much of North Dakota, Nebraska, and eastern South Dakota having an SMI below 0.0, including close to 20 percent of the region below -3.0. This marks a pretty stark reversal from earlier in 2020 when there was more concern about flooding than drought across the region. Drying also accelerated with the warm, windy days across the western Corn Belt with a lot of red on the map across far eastern Nebraska, western Iowa, and western Minnesota.
The good news for the southern Plains and western Corn Belt is most places in those two regions have picked up beneficial rains and more seasonal temperatures, wind speeds since the Thursday morning cutoff for the maps (Figure 3). This does not mean those areas are out of the woods with drought, but for now things have improved. The rain was certainly welcomed in western Iowa and Nebraska (though a few places had too much of a good thing) and your correspondent is happy to report that crops in northern Lancaster County, Nebraska looked quite good yesterday. See Figure 8 at the end for a visual. Would welcome comments on how things look in your neck of the woods either through email or on Twitter.
Another area of recent concern has been New England, especially given the heat late last week, including consecutive days over 95F in Caribou, ME. There was a bit of improvement near the Canadian border but overall this area is quite dry and was listed in the abnormally dry category on the Drought Monitor last week (Fig. 4). Given the lack of rain over the past week (Fig. 5), warmer temperatures increasing demand for moisture and the Evaporative Stress Index indicating some possible vegetation stress (Fig. 6), it is feasible that much of New England will officially be in drought on the map released on Thursday. Regardless the area needs increased attention as drought is more uncommon in that area, which may mean a much higher than usual risk for forest and wildfires in New England.
Across the southeastern U.S., things were pretty soggy, especially across North Carolina, southern Virginia, and parts of West Virginia. A little further to the west the region is just slightly on the dry side with a median SMI of-0.7 but with less than 5 percent of the area under -3.0. Much of the Pacific Northwest is still in long-term drought but last week did bring some additional late season precipitation, leaving soils fairly moist in many places for later June. The Four Corners region remains quite dry (even for them) and there were some pretty impressive wildfires on the GOES-16 satellite over New Mexico and Arizona last week.
Figure 1. The Soil Moisture Index (SMI) for the 7-day period ending 18 June 2020 (top left) and 11 June 2020 (bottom left). On the right-hand side are the grid points where the SMI is at or above 3.0 (top right, red) and grid points where the SMI is at or below 3.0 (bottom right, red). Results are based on output from the 0-1 m (surface to 3.23 feet) layers in the Noah-Multiparameterization (Noah-MP) land surface model. Noah-MP is run in the NASA Land Information System (LIS) framework with the North American Land Data Assimilation Version 2 (NLDAS-2) forcing dataset. The SMI calculation is based on the soil moisture index created in Hunt et al. (2009) such that ‘5’(dark green) is the wettest and ‘-5’ (dark red) the driest for the period of record. The period of record used calculate the SMI for the current map is 1979-present.
Table 1. The regional median SMI value from the current map and the percentage of grid points in the four regions with SMI values greater than 3.0 and less than -3.0. Regions are indicated by the boxes in Figure 1. In the median column, red(blue) font indicates a decrease(increase) of more than 0.5 over the previous week. In the percentage columns, red font is used to indicate a region where the percentage of grid points ≤ -3.0 increased by more than 10 points and blue font is used to indicate a region where the percentage of grid points ≥ 3.0 increased by more than 10 points.
Figure 2. SMI map from this week (upper left) and the previous three weeks: 11 June (upper right), 4 June (lower left), and 28 May (lower right).
Figure 3. 0-100 cm relative wetness from the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition Center (SPoRT) LIS simulation from 00Z on 22 June 2020.
Figure 4. U.S. Drought Monitor courtesy of the National Drought Mitigation Center.
Figure 5. Total precipitation over the past seven days (through Sunday 21 June). Map courtesy of the High Plains Regional Climate Center.
According to the latest Crop Progress Report, planting of the U.S. soybean is virtually complete. U.S. corn is currently rated at 72 percent Excellent/Good (E/G) against 5 percent Poor/Very Poor (P/VP), essentially the same as last week. Figure 7 shows that the median SMI of the Cron Belt is a little below 0 but within range of recent years (e.g., 2014, 2016-2018) that finished above trend. Soybean numbers are nearly identical at 70 and 5 percent respectively. The winter wheat crop is 96% headed with harvest rolling along in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Wheat condition is decent overall, 52 percent E/G vs. 17 percent P/VP, with a higher percentage of poor crop conditions in Colorado. Around 12 percent of the spring wheat has headed in the northern U.S. and over 75 percent of it is E/G. The developing drought in North Dakota will need to be watched carefully though as that is some of the most productive area for spring wheat in the U.S. Cotton planting is virtually complete and is in fair condition, with higher P/VP numbers coming out of Missouri, South Carolina, and Texas.
Figure 7. Median soil moisture index (SMI) at Week 24 from 1979-2020 and corn yield trend represented by the colored markers. Categories: Dark Blue > 10%, Blue +5 to 10%, Light Blue +1 to 5%, Gray -1 to 1%, Light Red -1 to -5 %, Red -5 to 10%, Dark Red <-10%.
Figure 8. Healthy looking corn in northern Lancaster County, NE. Almost all fields in the area are rainfed.
About the author:
Eric Hunt is an agricultural climatologist from Lincoln, NE and has several members of his extended family actively farming in Illinois and Nebraska. Eric has been with AER since 2012 and received his Ph.D. from the University of Nebraska. Among other activities, he is currently working on NASA funded projects to study the evolution of flash drought. He routinely blogs about agriculture and weather on the AER website. He can be reached via email at firstname.lastname@example.org and @DroughtLIS on Twitter.
Founded in 1977, Atmospheric and Environmental Research is an award-winning environmental research, consulting and weather information services company with demonstrated expertise in numerical weather prediction, climate dynamics and radiation, circulation diagnostics, atmospheric chemistry, air quality and risk assessment, planetary sciences, remote sensing, satellite meteorology, and systems engineering. Consulting services are available. AER is a business unit of Verisk Analytics (VRSK). For more information, please visit our web site at www.aer.com.
Disclaimer: This report and the information and data contained herein (the Report) are wholly advisory in nature and are provided AS IS. AER makes no representations, covenants or warranties of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the Report, including, without limitation, warranties of condition, quality, durability, suitability, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, or in respect of any warranty arising by statute or otherwise in law or from a course of dealing or usage of trade. The information included in the Report may be statistical samples and/or actuarial calculations and AER makes no warranties or representations, either express or implied, that the Report will accurately reflect, predict or resemble experience for an entire industry or any member or members of any industry. AER shall have no liability and shall not be responsible for business and legal conclusions, judgments and decisions made with respect to the Report. AER does not warrant and makes no representations regarding the completeness, currency, accuracy or predictive value of the Report. AER makes no representations and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the Report and is not responsible for errors resulting from omitted, misstated or erroneous information or assumptions.